Answers in Genesis says we will never find a forming star as they were all formed mature on Genesis D4.

Google Bard:

"The origin of the solar system is a topic that has been debated for centuries. One of the most popular theories is the nebular hypothesis, which states that the solar system formed from a spinning cloud of gas and dust. This cloud collapsed under its own gravity, and as it did, it flattened into a disk. The planets formed from this disk, with the Sun forming at the center.

The nebular hypothesis is supported by a number of observations. For example, the planets all orbit the Sun in the same direction, and they all have nearly circular orbits. This suggests that they all formed from a single rotating cloud of gas and dust.

However, the nebular hypothesis also has some problems. For example, it is not clear how the initial cloud of gas and dust could have been rotating fast enough to collapse into a disk. Additionally, the nebular hypothesis does not explain why the planets have such different compositions.

Another theory of the origin of the solar system is the giant impact hypothesis. This theory states that the solar system formed when a large object collided with the young Sun. This collision caused a large amount of debris to be ejected into space, and this debris eventually coalesced to form the planets.

The giant impact hypothesis is supported by a number of observations, including the fact that the Earth and Venus have similar compositions. This suggests that they may have formed from the same material. Additionally, the giant impact hypothesis can explain why the planets have such different orbits. The collision that formed the solar system may have imparted different amounts of angular momentum to the planets, which would explain why they have different orbits.

The origin of the solar system is still a mystery, but the nebular hypothesis and the giant impact hypothesis are two of the most popular theories. More research is needed to determine which theory is correct.

In his book "Origin of the Solar System," Roger Patterson discusses the nebular hypothesis and the giant impact hypothesis in detail. He also discusses other theories of the origin of the solar system, such as the planetesimal hypothesis and the cometary hypothesis. Patterson's book is a comprehensive and informative look at the origin of our solar system.

Here are some of the key points from Patterson's book:

  • The nebular hypothesis is the most popular theory of the origin of the solar system.

  • The giant impact hypothesis is a newer theory that is gaining support.

  • There are other theories of the origin of the solar system, but they are not as popular.

  • More research is needed to determine which theory is correct.

Patterson's book is a valuable resource for anyone who wants to learn more about the origin of our solar system. It is a comprehensive and informative book that discusses the nebular hypothesis, the giant impact hypothesis, and other theories of the origin of the solar system."

Article snippets

Origin of the Solar System

https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/solar-system/origin-of-the-solar-system/

There are many problems with the models and hypotheses that are used to support the naturalistic story of how the solar system formed.

The naturalistic story of the solar system goes back 4.5 billion years. In this view the solar system began as a cloud of dust and gas that collapsed on itself

A star began to form as the cloud was compressed by some unknown force. As the star spun and collected more mass, a disk of dust began to form the planets. Over millions of years the young solar system was formed.

Artists’ depictions of the events make them look real, but they are just a story to explain why God is not necessary.

Evolutionists suggest that the stars form as gases (hydrogen and helium in the early universe) collapse due to gravity

evolutionists would then suggest that a protostar would form and continue to gain mass as it attracted nearby gas and particles.

The Bible teaches that the earth was formed on Day One and the stars on Day Four

The nebular hypothesis is simply a story to describe what may have happened in the “prehistoric” solar system. There are no observations to support the claims that natural processes over millions of years could form a solar system. The Bible gives a clear description of the formation of the earth by the spoken word of God.

the Bible teaches. Genesis 1:2–6 makes it clear that the earth was created as a ball covered with water

In the nebular hypothesis the earth formed as a molten mass in the early solar system.

Earth created before the sun

Sun formed before the earth

Earth created before the stars

Stars formed before the earth


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "One-Way" Speed of Light is measured for the first time.

Image
Jeremiah 33:25 Thus says the Lord, 'If My covenant for day and night stand not, and the fixed patterns of heaven and earth I have not established, Job 38:19 "Where is the way to the dwelling of light?.. That you may take it to its territory And that you may discern the paths to its home? The observation of gravitational waves and gamma ray bursts from two neutron star–black hole coalescences in 2020 was a major breakthrough in astrophysics. It was the first time that gravitational waves and gamma ray bursts had been detected from such a system, and it provided new insights into the nature of these extreme objects. One of the most intriguing aspects of these observations is that they confirm the one-way speed of light. The speed of light is a fundamental constant of nature, and it is the same in all frames of reference. This means that, regardless of how fast you are moving, light will always travel at the same speed relative to you. The one-way speed of light has been tested
Read more

Distant Starlight and the Anisotropic Synchrony Convention: A Challenge from Neutron Star Mergers

Image
“As these neutron stars spiraled together, they emitted gravitational waves that were detectable for about 100 seconds; when they collided, a flash of light in the form of gamma rays was emitted and seen on Earth about two seconds after the gravitational waves .” The Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) is a proposed solution to the " distant starlight problem" encountered in young-earth creationism. It was proposed by Dr Jason Lisles of Answers in Genesis. This problem arises from the apparent contradiction between the young earth biblical age of the universe (thousands of years) and the vast distances we observe through telescopes (billions of light-years). The ASC proposes that the speed of light is not constant in all directions, but rather travels instantly towards the observer, explaining how we see light from seemingly young stars. However, recent observations of neutron star mergers present a significant challenge to the ASC.  In 2017, the LIGO and
Read more

The nebular hypothesis - a challenge to Young Earth Creationism?

Image
Psalms 90 : (written by Moses before Genesis) “ Before the mountains were born Or You gave birth to the earth and the world, Even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God. For a thousand years in Your sight Are like yesterday when it passes by, Or as a watch in the night.” Some recent Young Earth Creationists (YEC) posit that stars were created on Genesis Day 4 of creation as described in the Bible, using the 24-hour day interpretation. This implies that we shouldn't expect to find stars actively forming in the universe today . However, the nebular hypothesis , which proposes that stars and planets form from the gravitational collapse of giant clouds of gas and dust, is fully supported by scientific evidence.  Answers in Genesis (AiG) criticizes the nebular hypothesis over 700 times on their website. Their claims haven't been accepted by the scientific community as well as many many other Christians. On their website an article has the below illustration and
Read more