Danny Faulkner “Rethinking Dark Energy: A Chink in the Cosmic Armor?” (a review)


Faulkner: The late 1990s witnessed a paradigm shift in cosmology with the discovery of dark energy, a mysterious force believed to be driving the universe's accelerating expansion. This article explores the recent challenge to this established theory and the potential implications.

Prior to this discovery, the universe's expansion, initially observed by Edwin Hubble, was thought to be slowing down. However, two independent teams observed that distant type Ia supernovae, typically used as distance indicators due to their consistent luminosity, appeared fainter than expected. This unexpected observation suggested an accelerating expansion, necessitating the introduction of dark energy.

Dark energy, unlike its counterpart dark matter, doesn't interact with light or normal matter directly and remains largely unexplained. This "unknown" aspect has led some researchers to question its existence especially as it is so fine-tuned. Excellent YouTube on this. A recent study proposes an alternative explanation for the fainter supernovae, challenging the very foundation of dark energy.

The study argues that the observed decrease in the supernovae's brightness could be attributed to properties of the galaxies they reside in, rather than the universe's expansion rate. Specifically, factors like the galaxies' shape, mass, and star formation rate might influence their peak brightness, leading to misinterpretations. This would imply that the universe's expansion might not be accelerating, potentially casting doubt on the existence of dark energy.

However, it's crucial to remember that this is a recent study, and its validity needs further scrutiny. If proven accurate, the implications would be far-reaching. It would invalidate a considerable portion of cosmological research conducted over the past two decades, forcing a significant revision of our understanding of the universe.


Editor: Here is that study.

Investigating Luminosity Evolution in Type Ia Supernovae: A Challenge to Standard Cosmology?

The research presented in "Early-type Host Galaxies of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Evidence for Luminosity Evolution in Supernova Cosmology" by Kang et al. (2020) challenges a fundamental assumption in modern cosmology. This assumption is that Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) always have the same intrinsic brightness, regardless of when they exploded. This property allows them to be used as "standard candles" to measure cosmic distances and understand the expansion of the universe.

The authors argue that their analysis of nearby early-type galaxies hosting SNe Ia reveals a correlation between the standardized luminosity (brightness after applying a correction factor) and the age of the host galaxy. This suggests that SNe Ia might be fainter in older galaxies, potentially biasing distance measurements and impacting our understanding of the universe's expansion history, particularly the existence of dark energy.


However, this claim has been well contested by other studies:

  • Alternative Explanations: Some argue that the observed correlation could be due to factors other than age, such as dust extinction in the host galaxy, which can dim the observed light of the supernova. Further studies are needed to disentangle the effects of various factors.

  • Statistical Significance: Some studies question the statistical significance of the correlation found by Kang et al., suggesting their findings might be due to chance or a limited sample size. Replication with larger and more diverse datasets is crucial.

  • Different Methods: Other research groups have employed different methods for analyzing SNe Ia data and haven't found a significant correlation with age. This suggests the need for further exploration and refinement of analysis techniques.

As the quest for a deeper understanding of the cosmos continues, refining our tools and exploring alternative avenues remain crucial.


Scientists use various indirect methods to probe dark energy's effects on the universe and estimate its properties


Here are several methods:

  1. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Radiation: This faint afterglow from the universe's beginning carries imprints of the universe's early conditions. By studying the tiny fluctuations in the CMB temperature and polarization, scientists can learn about the universe's geometry and the amount of dark energy present.

  2. Large Scale Structure (LSS): The distribution of galaxies and galaxy clusters across the cosmos forms a large-scale structure. Analyzing this structure and its evolution over time helps scientists understand the growth of structure and the influence of dark energy on it.

  3. Redshift-Distance Relationship: Measuring the redshift of distant objects like galaxies and quasars and their corresponding distances allows astronomers to map the expansion history of the universe. Deviations from the expected expansion rate due to gravity alone point towards the existence of dark energy.

  4. Weak Gravitational Lensing: Massive objects like galaxies bend light due to gravity, causing a slight distortion in the images of background galaxies. By measuring this distortion, scientists can map the distribution of mass in the universe and infer the presence of dark energy, which affects the strength of gravitational lensing.

  5. Galaxy Cluster Counts: Counting the number of galaxy clusters in different regions of the universe at various distances can reveal information about dark energy. The abundance of clusters is sensitive to the expansion history and the growth of structure over time, influenced by dark energy.

  6. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO): These are faint echoes of sound waves that traveled through the early universe, leaving an imprint on the distribution of galaxies. Measuring the characteristic scale of these BAO helps constrain the expansion history and the properties of dark energy.

  7. Shear Measurement: This technique involves measuring the distortion of distant galaxies' shapes due to the combined gravitational pull of large-scale structures along their line of sight. Analyzing this shear allows scientists to probe the growth of structure and the influence of dark energy.

By combining data from multiple techniques and continually refining our observations, scientists are gradually building a more comprehensive picture of dark energy and its role in the universe's evolution.


Faulkner:

The potential connection to creationist arguments must be handled cautiously. While some creationists might use this study to support their views, it's essential to maintain a scientific perspective and avoid misinterpretations. Scientific inquiry relies on the continuous evaluation and updating of existing theories, not the validation of specific religious ideologies.

The scientific community's reception of the study remains unknown. Further research and critical analysis are necessary before drawing definitive conclusions. It's also important to remember that the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded for the discovery of accelerating expansion, highlighting the current scientific consensus.

In conclusion, while this study presents a fascinating challenge, it's premature to declare the demise of dark energy. We must remain cautious and encourage further investigation before accepting this revised interpretation. Scientific progress often involves revisiting established theories, but it should always be guided by rigorous evidence and objective analysis.


Editor:

A conundrum between science and the bible

The old testament has 12 verses pointing out God stretched out (and is stretching) apart the heavens eg Isaiah 44:24 “I, the Lord, am the maker of all things, Stretching out the heavens by Myself And spreading out the earth all alone,”

This is an elegant description of dark energy. However this force is extremely small, requiring vast time to act. The implications of this force must give some creationists pause.

Rethinking Dark Energy: A Fly in the Cosmic Ointment


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "One-Way" Speed of Light is measured for the first time.

Image
Jeremiah 33:25 Thus says the Lord, 'If My covenant for day and night stand not, and the fixed patterns of heaven and earth I have not established, Job 38:19 "Where is the way to the dwelling of light?.. That you may take it to its territory And that you may discern the paths to its home? The observation of gravitational waves and gamma ray bursts from two neutron star–black hole coalescences in 2020 was a major breakthrough in astrophysics. It was the first time that gravitational waves and gamma ray bursts had been detected from such a system, and it provided new insights into the nature of these extreme objects. One of the most intriguing aspects of these observations is that they confirm the one-way speed of light. The speed of light is a fundamental constant of nature, and it is the same in all frames of reference. This means that, regardless of how fast you are moving, light will always travel at the same speed relative to you. The one-way speed of light has been tested
Read more

Distant Starlight and the Anisotropic Synchrony Convention: A Challenge from Neutron Star Mergers

Image
“As these neutron stars spiraled together, they emitted gravitational waves that were detectable for about 100 seconds; when they collided, a flash of light in the form of gamma rays was emitted and seen on Earth about two seconds after the gravitational waves .” The Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) is a proposed solution to the " distant starlight problem" encountered in young-earth creationism. It was proposed by Dr Jason Lisles of Answers in Genesis. This problem arises from the apparent contradiction between the young earth biblical age of the universe (thousands of years) and the vast distances we observe through telescopes (billions of light-years). The ASC proposes that the speed of light is not constant in all directions, but rather travels instantly towards the observer, explaining how we see light from seemingly young stars. However, recent observations of neutron star mergers present a significant challenge to the ASC.  In 2017, the LIGO and
Read more

The nebular hypothesis - a challenge to Young Earth Creationism?

Image
Psalms 90 : (written by Moses before Genesis) “ Before the mountains were born Or You gave birth to the earth and the world, Even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God. For a thousand years in Your sight Are like yesterday when it passes by, Or as a watch in the night.” Some recent Young Earth Creationists (YEC) posit that stars were created on Genesis Day 4 of creation as described in the Bible, using the 24-hour day interpretation. This implies that we shouldn't expect to find stars actively forming in the universe today . However, the nebular hypothesis , which proposes that stars and planets form from the gravitational collapse of giant clouds of gas and dust, is fully supported by scientific evidence.  Answers in Genesis (AiG) criticizes the nebular hypothesis over 700 times on their website. Their claims haven't been accepted by the scientific community as well as many many other Christians. On their website an article has the below illustration and
Read more